![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS5yZJHDaAjewy1V9IRshwO_Ai7yKgmaeU5YHkrC5T4vHHrU_HrnRcBlCVLWqDMpFxNrFkXnhTtRwPl_ytlEfMl9EeXdLsN5SS8COr_3MF5fmhqEs6_xr2_fxFIZuDCXEW9IIFuHAy-RWp/s320/STI_468x60.gif)
Preference for gel over suppository as delivery vehicle for a rectal microbicide: results of a randomised, crossover acceptability trial among men who have sex with men
Author(s): Carballo-Diéguez A, Dolezal C, Bauermeister JA, et al
Reference: Sex Transm Infect. 01 November 2008;84(6):483-87.
Published Abstract:
Objective: To assess whether men who have sex with men (MSM) prefer a gel or a suppository as a delivery vehicle for a rectal microbicide. Methods: 77 HIV-negative MSM with a recent history of inconsistent condom use during receptive anal intercourse (RAI) who acknowledged being at risk of contracting HIV were enrolled in a randomised, crossover acceptability trial. They compared 35 ml placebo gel with 8 g placebo rectal suppositories used on up to three RAI occasions each.
Results: Participants preferred the gel over the suppository (75% versus 25%, p<0.001) style="font-weight: bold;">Conclusions: In this sample taken from one of the populations most likely to benefit from rectal microbicide availability, gel had greater acceptability than a suppository as a potential microbicide vehicle.
Click here for the full article, on the IRMA website.
No comments:
Post a Comment