Showing posts with label efficacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label efficacy. Show all posts

Friday, October 28, 2011

HPV Vaccine against Anal HPV Infection and Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

via The New England Journal of Medicine, by Joel M. Palefsky, M.D., Anna R. Giuliano, Ph.D., Stephen Goldstone, M.D., Edson D. Moreira, Jr., M.D., Carlos Aranda, M.D., Heiko Jessen, M.D., Richard Hillman, M.D., Daron Ferris, M.D., Francois Coutlee, M.D., Mark H. Stoler, M.D., J. Brooke Marshall, Ph.D., David Radley, M.S., Scott Vuocolo, Ph.D., Richard M. Haupt, M.D., M.P.H.

Background

The rate of anal cancer is increasing among both women and men, particularly men who have sex with men. Caused by infection with human papillomavirus (HPV), primarily HPV type 16 or 18, anal cancer is preceded by high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (grade 2 or 3). We studied the safety and efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (qHPV) against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV-6,11, 16, or 18 infection in men who have sex with men.

Methods

In a substudy of a larger double-blind study, we randomly assigned 602 healthy men who have sex with men, 16 to 26 years of age, to receive either qHPV or placebo. The primary efficacy objective was prevention of anal intraepithelial neoplasia or anal cancer related to infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18. Efficacy analyses were performed in intention-totreat and per-protocol efficacy populations. The rates of adverse events were documented.

Results

Efficacy of the qHPV vaccine against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was 50.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.7 to 67.2) in the intention-to-treat population and 77.5% (95% CI, 39.6 to 93.3) in the per-protocol efficacy population; the corresponding efficacies against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV of any type were 25.7% (95% CI, −1.1 to 45.6) and 54.9% (95% CI, 8.4 to 79.1), respectively. Rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia per 100 person-years were 17.5 in the placebo group and 13.0 in the vaccine group in the intention-to-treat population and 8.9 in the placebo group and 4.0 in the vaccine group in the per-protocol efficacy population. The rate of grade 2 or 3 anal intraepithelial neoplasia related to infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was reduced by 54.2% (95% CI, 18.0 to 75.3) in the intention-to-treat population and by 74.9% (95% CI, 8.8 to 95.4) in the per-protocol efficacy population. The corresponding risks of persistent anal infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 were reduced by 59.4% (95% CI, 43.0 to 71.4) and 94.9% (95% CI, 80.4 to 99.4), respectively. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Use of the qHPV vaccine reduced the rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia, including of grade 2 or 3, among men who have sex with men. The vaccine had a favorable safety profile and may help to reduce the risk of anal cancer. (Funded by Merck and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090285.)

Read the full study here.



[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Catholics and Condoms: Why What the Pope Says Matters

via The Body, by Jon O'Brien

During his 2009 trip to Cameroon, a country with an HIV prevalence rate of over 5%, Pope Benedict XVI made a shocking assertion on condom use to prevent HIV. He told reporters, "You can't resolve it with the distribution of condoms. On the contrary, it increases the problem."

Read the rest.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Next IRMA Global Teleconference - Efficacy and Effectiveness - What is Good Enough? Who decides?

JOIN US
Efficacy and Effectiveness - What is Good Enough? Who decides?
Friday, December 4, 2009


7a – Los Angeles
9a – Chicago, Lima
10a – NYC
3p - London
4p - Lagos
5p - Johannesburg
8:30p - Delhi
2A - Sydney

Join IRMA, the Global Campaign for Microbicides and the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and our panel of distinguished speakers (below) for what is sure to be a provocative and dynamic discussion about efficacy and effectiveness of new prevention technologies – PrEP, male circumcision, vaccines, and microbicides.

What is acceptable to communities in both the developing and developed world? What about behaviour change? How do we balance public health impact vs. the needs of the individual? We won’t be able to answer all of these questions – but we can start the discussion!

Please RSVP today.You must RSVP to receive dial-in information.

Featured speakers include Gus Cairns, Editor, HIV Treatment Update NAM Publications (Aidsmap); Dr Sheila Harvey MDP301 Trial Coordinator, Mwanza, Tanzania; and Dr. Roger Tatoud, Senior Programme Manager, International HIV Clinical Trial Research Management Office, Imperial College London. Representatives from AVAC and GCM will also make comments.

Special thanks to AVAC for hosting the call!

Click here for materials (PowerPoints and recordings) from past IRMA Global Teleconferences.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...